Phase 3 · W27–W28
W27–W28: Operational Metrics & Reporting
Turn classifier, routing, clustering, and eval outputs into automated reports that drive operational decisions.
Suggested time: 4–6 hours/week
Outcomes
- A weekly ops report generated automatically.
- A top recurring issues section with counts and trend context.
- Routing breakdown across dev, data, config, and manual actions.
- Model health stats including accuracy, needs_human, and drift flags.
- A short executive summary that stays honest and actionable.
Deliverables
- Automated weekly report file saved under /reports/ with date.
- Metrics tables for routing, top clusters, and DQ failures.
- AI health section with regression pass/fail and drift signals.
- Top 5 next-action list linked to cluster/rule_id evidence.
Prerequisites
- W25–W26: Evaluation (accuracy, drift, regressions)
W27–W28: Operational Metrics & Reporting
What you’re doing
You take your AI Ticket Analyzer and turn it into something that helps you run AMS like a machine.
Right now you have:
- classification
- routing
- clustering
- evaluation
Cool. Now make it visible.
Because if nobody sees it, nobody trusts it, and it dies.
Time: 4–6 hours/week
Output: an ops report pack (weekly/monthly) + metrics tables that show what’s happening and what to fix next
The promise (what you’ll have by the end)
By the end of W28 you will have:
- A “weekly ops report” generated automatically
- A “top recurring issues” section with counts + trends
- Routing stats (what goes to dev vs data vs config)
- Model health stats (accuracy, needs_human, drift flags)
- A simple executive summary that doesn’t lie
The rule: reports must drive decisions
A report that doesn’t change a decision is just decoration.
Every section must answer:
- what happened?
- why it matters?
- what we do next?
What to include in your report (keep it tight)
1) Volume and trend
- total tickets processed
- trend vs last period
- spikes (top days)
2) Routing breakdown
- % dev required
- % data quality
- % config/customizing
- % manual client action
This shows where your team is bleeding time.
3) Recurring issues (clusters)
- top 10 clusters by count
- trend vs last week/month
- recommended actions (runbook/fix/mapping)
This is your “investment list”.
4) Data quality top pain
- top rule_id failures
- top fields with issues
- countries/sales orgs with most problems (if relevant)
This turns DQ into a targeted plan.
5) AI system health
- golden set accuracy (latest)
- needs_human rate
- invalid output rate (should be 0)
- drift flags (if label distribution changed)
This stops silent quality decay.
Step-by-step checklist
1) Define the report format
Pick one:
- markdown report generated to /reports/
- HTML page in your app
- both (markdown is enough for v1)
Start with markdown. It’s easy to ship.
2) Build a report generator
One command:
- queries DB (or reads logs)
- computes metrics
- prints a clean report file
Do not hand-write reports. Automate.
3) Add “executive summary” (but keep it honest)
Top 3 bullets:
- biggest spike
- biggest recurring issue
- best next fix to reduce volume
No corporate fluff. Just reality.
4) Make it periodic
Weekly report is enough.
If you want monthly too, make monthly a rollup.
5) Make it shareable
If someone opens the report, they should understand it without you explaining for 30 minutes.
Deliverables (you must ship these)
Deliverable A — Automated weekly report
- report file generated (markdown/html)
- stored under /reports/ with date
Deliverable B — Metrics tables
- routing breakdown
- top clusters
- top DQ failures
Deliverable C — AI health section
- accuracy + needs_human + drift flags
- regression summary (pass/fail)
Deliverable D — “Next actions” list
- top 5 actions to reduce ticket load
- each action linked to cluster/rule_id evidence
Common traps (don’t do this)
Report first. Dashboards are optional.
- Trap 1: “Dashboard before report.”
Tables + a short summary beats a rainbow dashboard.
- Trap 2: “Too many charts.”
Without actions, the report is useless.
- Trap 3: “No next actions.”
Quick self-check (2 minutes)
Answer yes/no:
- Is the report generated automatically (no manual work)?
- Does it show routing breakdown and recurring issues?
- Does it include DQ pain with rule_id evidence?
- Does it include AI health (accuracy/needs_human/drift)?
- Does it end with a clear next-action list?
If any “no” — fix it before moving on.