How to If You Think of a Great Idea but Don’t Have Time to Explore It, (Do It)

1. Where the lot lives. We choose a single home, not three. Today, it is the Brali LifeOS “Smart Idea Parking Lot.” It is a plain list with structured fields, a “Quick Capture” button that opens directly into the template, and a scheduled weekly review. If we prefer paper, we mirror it: a notebook’s front section titled “Idea Parking Lot,” each entry on a new line with the same compact fields.

2. The capture ritual. We will keep it short: a 30–60 second interruption. We will not add links, images, and multiple steps now. We write enough to re‑grow the idea later.

3. The review rhythm. We book a recurring 20‑minute slot weekly (e.g., Friday 16:00). This is non‑negotiable. In that window, we sort—Delete, Defer, Promote. Promote means we rewrite the idea as a task with a first test. Defer means we keep it one more cycle. Delete means we thank it and let it go.

4. The constraint we accept: we cannot chase nine ideas a week. We choose a cap—promote at most 1–2 ideas per week—and we hold it. The rest wait or expire.

We begin with a small scene. We are on a call, listening to a long status update. A thought lands: 90% of the team’s blockers are waiting for review. The one‑line fix: visible SLA with daily triage. We do not interrupt the call. We open the Brali LifeOS app, tap Quick Capture. Title: “Daily triage SLA.” Gist: “Publish 24h review promise + daily 10m triage at 10:40.” Why now: “backlog complaints x3 this week.” First next step: “Draft Slack message; ask leads for 10:40 slot.” Expiry: “2025‑10‑20.” Energy: 3/5. Time: 30m. Save. We return to listening. Our main task did not collapse. The idea did not evaporate.

And then a different scene. We are washing dishes on a Thursday. The brain throws a marketing angle for a product launch we are not even managing. We do not dry our hands and run; we say it aloud into our phone’s voice‑to‑text capture: “Launch angle: customer quotes first, feature second; three 10‑sec clips.” Later, we reformat it with the fields.

We will practice three choices now.

Choice 1: Decide the capture bound We set a hard limit: 45 seconds per idea during live work. If it cannot be captured in that window, it is too big; we capture the thread, not the fabric.

• Title must be ≤7 words. If we cannot name it in seven words, we do not understand it enough yet.
• Gist ≤140 characters. If the gist runs long, we are writing a memo.
• First step ≤10 minutes. If the first step is bigger, we split it or note “needs scoping.”

We put this in motion today. We can test it on four ideas over the next 24 hours. We will feel the difference: the idea no longer tugs, and the main task stays warm. We notice a small relief in the chest.

Choice 2: Decide the review anchor We book Friday at 16:00 for 20 minutes. We protect it by pairing it with an existing end‑of‑week action (submit timesheet, send weekly note). Habit science favors piggybacking. We will not negotiate this slot for three weeks.

• In the review: we sort the list. We ask three questions per idea:
  1. Is this still true or timely? If no, delete.
  2. Can a 10‑minute test generate signal? If yes, promote and schedule the test.
  3. Does this align with current quarter goals (>60% match)? If no, defer or archive.

We tally how many we delete versus promote each week. A healthy lot clears 50–70% within two weeks—because many ideas are sparks, not logs.

Choice 3: Decide the promotion limit We cap promotion at 2 ideas/week. This is a guardrail against the excitement of possibility. If we want to promote a third, we must demote or finish one. Constraint builds trust in the system: we know we will not drown.

A short detour: evidence and trade‑offs

• Working memory holds about 4 items at once (Cowan, 2001). When we ask it to hold both a current task and a fresh idea, we increase error rates and subjective stress. Offloading to an external system reduces the load.
• Context switching costs are real; after an interruption, it can take ~23 minutes to return to the original focus (Mark, González, and Harris, 2005). If we chase the idea now, we may lose half an hour. If we capture it in 45 seconds, we protect the current thread.
• Trade‑off: if we capture everything, we risk clutter. The weekly review is the filter. If we skip it, the lot becomes a junk drawer. We pay 20 minutes weekly to prevent hours of mental re‑checking.

Let’s make it operational.

The live pattern: four micro‑scenes we will practice today Scene A: During deep work (writing)

• Feeling: the sense a better approach is possible.
• Action: tap Quick Capture; write fields; close; return to text. 45 seconds.
• Choice: we do not add links. We add the expiry 7 days from today by default.
• After: we re‑read the last sentence before resuming to resolder the focus.

Scene B: In a meeting

• Feeling: a topic surfaces we could solve but it is not on the agenda.
• Action: we say, “Let’s park this and return Friday,” then capture it ourselves.
• Choice: if others contribute, we add one shared tag “team” and the initials of the owner who should see it.
• After: we drop a note in the meeting doc: “Parked: [title] — review Friday.”

Scene C: In transit or chores

• Feeling: the brain’s idle mode serves a stray idea.
• Action: voice‑to‑text “Idea, Title: … Gist: …” Brali converts the first line to title, second to gist. We fill expiry later.
• Choice: we do not look at the phone. Safety first. Voice capture only.

Scene D: At night

• Feeling: a sharp thought before sleep.
• Action: bedside paper or phone; same fields; we close it. Light off.
• Choice: we tag “night” to notice if late ideas are higher noise.

We will notice temptations: to flesh it out, to add context, to email someone immediately. We will resist. We will trust the review.

What will we do in the review? We open the lot. We sort by expiry ascending (soonest first). For each item, we answer five fast checks:

• Still true? Y/N
• Still ours to do? Y/N
• Valuable in the next 14 days? Y/N
• 10‑minute test exists? Y/N
• Energy available next week (1–5)? 1–5

We set two rules:

• If two or more “N,” delete or archive.
• If all “Y” and energy ≥3, promote.

Promote means this:

• We transform “first next step” into a scheduled block (10 minutes on the calendar) and a task in our main task list.
• We add a small metric to the idea if applicable (e.g., “target: reduce review SLA from 72h to 24h”).
• We decide what “success” looks like for the 10‑minute test.

If an idea survives one week without promotion and still seems good, we allow one more week. After two weeks, if not promoted, we delete or archive to a “Later” list. We do this to protect the lot’s clarity. Not all good things are for now.

We also keep a weekly count:

• Ideas captured this week: [number]
• Ideas deleted: [number]
• Ideas promoted: [number]
• Minutes spent capturing: [sum of 45‑second logs]
• Minutes spent reviewing: 20

We might notice, as we did, that the act of deletion feels surprisingly positive. Letting an idea go because it is no longer true is a sign of an evolving view, not a failure. We get the relief without the guilt because the system gave it a fair hearing.

A common misconception we will shed: “If it was truly a great idea, we would remember.” That is not how cognition works. We remember the emotional trace, not the content. Another misconception: “If we capture, we will clog our systems.” That is true if we do not review. Capture plus review is the habit; capture alone is hoarding.

The plumbing—fields, tags, and expiry We will adopt a minimalist schema that makes ideas portable between app and paper:

• Title: ≤7 words. Examples: “Daily triage SLA,” “3‑slide exec update,” “Two‑question onboarding,” “Archive stale tickets.”
• One‑line gist: ≤140 characters. Examples: “Promise 24h review; public board; 10:40 daily triage slot,” “Replace 19‑page deck with 3 slides (goal, risk, ask).”
• Why now / trigger: one phrase that signals context. “3 backlog complaints,” “Recent customer churn,” “CEO asked for brevity.”
• First next step: a single action, ≤10 minutes. “Draft Slack poll,” “Pull last week’s metrics,” “Write 3 slide headers.”
• Expiry date: the day when the idea loses bite. Default: today + 7 days. If seasonal, set wider: +30 days.
• Energy tag: 1–5. Low-energy ideas are easier to start; keep a few for tired days.
• Time tag: estimate minutes to test (10, 30, 60). If >60, split.

Optional shared tags: “team,” “personal,” “ops,” “product,” “writing.” We keep it simple. We do not invent a taxonomy we will abandon. Two to five tags are enough.

Why expiry? Because stale ideas look like real ones in the list. Expiry forces us to reconsider with time’s friction. Many ideas are time‑sensitive; after a week, the world moves.

We assumed X: “More detailed capture will save future time.” We observed Y: We avoided capturing because it was work; we carried ideas in our head and lost them; the lot stayed empty. We changed to Z: We imposed a 45‑second capture cap and a tiny template; we shifted detail into the weekly review slot. Within 14 days, our capture count rose from 3→11 ideas/week, delete rate stabilized at ~60%, and promotion rate at 1–2/week. Capturing minutes averaged 3–5 per day. Our main work time did not shrink because each capture was short.

This pivot matters because detail is seductive. We like to feel we did something. But what we need at capture time is preservation, not progress.

We will show the math of a normal day.

• 08:55 Idea 1 (meeting): “3‑slide exec update” — capture 45s
• 11:20 Idea 2 (solo work): “Batch approvals 11:30/16:30” — capture 35s
• 14:05 Idea 3 (reading): “Customer quotes first in launch” — capture 50s
• 16:40 Review? Not today (review is Friday)

Totals:

• Ideas captured: 3
• Capture time: 45 + 35 + 50 = 130 seconds ≈ 2.2 minutes
• Review time: 0 minutes (off‑day)
• Main task time preserved: we avoided at least 1 context switch deep dive (~23 minutes risk), per Mark et al. It costs us ~2 minutes to save ~20+.

Numbers are not everything, but they help us see trade‑offs rather than feel them. A two‑minute habit to save twenty minutes later is a fair deal.

On Friday at 16:00, we open the lot. We sort by expiry. We run through seven entries:

1. “3‑slide exec update” — still true; we can test by rewriting one deck’s top page into three slides; schedule 10 minutes Monday 09:30; promote.
2. “Batch approvals 11:30/16:30” — still true; needs a check with two peers; first step 10‑minute Slack ping; promote.
3. “Customer quotes first in launch” — not ours to drive this month; defer one week; if still appealing, share with marketing friend next Friday.
4. “Archive stale tickets” — stale; our system changed; delete.
5. “Onboarding two questions only” — idea migrated to a team OKR; archive with link to project.
6. “No‑meeting Wednesday 9–11” — interesting; energy 2/5; keep one more week.
7. “Write lunch‑and‑learn on heuristics” — not this quarter; delete.

We spend 18 minutes. We leave with two 10‑minute tests on the calendar. We feel a quiet satisfaction. The rest are gone or parked properly. No guilt threads left untied into the weekend.

We avoid heavy frameworks. But if we need a tie‑breaker between two good ideas, we use a light Impact–Clarity–Cost score:

• Impact (1–5): likely value if it works in the next 14 days.
• Clarity (1–5): how well we understand the first step.
• Cost (minutes): estimate for first test.

Priority score = (Impact + Clarity)
− (Cost/10). We pick the top score when deciding which one or two to promote.

We test it on two ideas:

• A) “Daily triage SLA” — Impact 4, Clarity 5, Cost 30 → 4+5−3=6
• B) “3‑slide exec update” — Impact 3, Clarity 4, Cost 10 → 3+4−1=6 Tie. We choose the one with a nearer dependency or the one that matches current goals better. We acknowledge that scoring helps but does not decide everything.

• Driving or cycling: we capture by voice only. If not safe, we repeat a “mental tag” (Title + gist repeated 3 times) and capture at the next safe stop. Safety is not negotiable.
• Confidential ideas: we mark “confidential” tag and keep details light; we store specifics in a secure note and link only a reference. If we are under an NDA, we avoid capturing sensitive client identifiers.
• Team vs. personal: we keep one lot each. We avoid mixing because it increases friction when sharing. For team ideas, we capture in the team lot with owner initials. For personal ideas, we keep them in ours.
• ADHD or high distractibility: we add a tactile ritual—stand, step away, capture on paper, return. We also set the app to vibrate after 45 seconds to prevent over‑writing. We keep the weekly review immediately after a recurring event to anchor it (e.g., after lunch on Friday). We consider using a timer chime for the review segment: 3 minutes skim, 12 minutes decide, 5 minutes schedule.
• Over‑capture: if we capture >15 ideas/week for three weeks, we will add a 5‑minute “pre‑screen” mid‑week to delete obvious noise. Or we add a simple throttle: only capture during work hours; outside, we log “bucket” ideas and triage on Friday.
• Perfectionism: we may hesitate to write an imperfect gist. We remind ourselves: capture preserves possibility; review is for quality.
• Fear of missing out: we may feel we must promote many ideas. We hold the promotion cap. The cap is what makes the lot trustworthy; without it, the lot becomes a guilt engine.
• Working in regulated environments: we avoid capturing protected data. We write idea structures, not content. “Automate redaction workflow with rule‑based templates” rather than “Use client X data set.”

What if the lot grows cold? It can happen. We might stop trusting it if we skip reviews. If we miss one week, we run a “reboot”:

• Step 1 (5 minutes): delete everything older than 30 days, guilt‑free.
• Step 2 (10 minutes): skim the rest; keep at most 10; delete the rest.
• Step 3 (5 minutes): re‑book the review; invite someone to co‑review once to rebuild the habit.

We treat the system gently. It serves us; we do not serve it.

We often hear, “My idea list is where ideas go to die.” That is a design problem, not a fate. Two design features keep the lot alive: expiry and promotion cap. Expiry ensures we do not mistake nostalgia for relevance. The cap ensures we do not pretend to action what we cannot deliver. Together, they produce a lot that breathes: ideas arrive, are tested, and either join the real work or are thanked and dismissed.

We add a small measure to make our progress visible:

• Capture consistency: days with ≥1 capture this week (target 4–5).
• Review consistency: weekly session completed (Y/N).
• Promotion flow: promoted 1–2 items (target met Y/N).

We log these in Brali automatically via the check‑in.

Short practice lab: build the habit today in 20 minutes

• Minute 0–3: Open Brali LifeOS, Smart Idea Parking Lot. If paper, title the first page, draw 6 short field lines for entries.
• Minute 3–8: Add two “seed” ideas already in your head using the fields. Set expiry +7 days.
• Minute 8–12: Book the Friday 16:00 review (20 minutes). If that is impossible, pick Wednesday 12:40. Protect it by pairing it with an existing routine.
• Minute 12–16: Add the “Quick Capture (30s)” button to your home screen. On paper, fold a small card with the field prompts and place it near your keyboard.
• Minute 16–20: Run one dry‑run: capture a fake idea in 45 seconds. Feel the pace. Adjust the field labels if needed.

We close the app. We return to work. The lot is ready.

What about creative fields? If we write, code, design, or lead, our ideas might be fuzzy and interdependent. The same pattern holds. The gist will be the difference. We frame the idea in terms of usefulness or hypothesis. “If we open with a personal story, we increase reading time by 15%.” We set a simple test: draft a 150‑word opening with a story. We can also tag “play” for ideas that are not immediately instrumental; we let the review carry them forward or release them.

If we fear that capturing will dull the idea’s edge, we jot the felt sense: a sensory anchor or emotional tag. “Tone: relief; pace: slow.” Later, it helps us reconstruct the mood.

When we facilitate, we set a visible parking lot in the room (physical or digital). We give it the same fields minus expiry. At the end of the meeting, we do a 5‑minute sweep: each owner takes their item into their personal lot with an expiry. This matters: group parking lots become graveyards; personal lots with review rhythms become engines.

Trade‑offs for teams:

• Visible parking reduces derailment; too much parking can suppress useful pivots. We allow 2 “break glass” moments per meeting where we intentionally follow an idea for up to 10 minutes. We signal it so it does not become a habit.
• Centralized vs. distributed lots: central is good for shared commitments; distributed is better for ownership and follow‑through. We combine: central for decisions; personal for ideas.

We may feel irritation at the interruption of a fresh idea—like a friend knocking at the wrong moment. We may also feel guilt at postponing it. The lot changes that emotional texture. We put the idea in a room with light and air. We promise to return. In our experience, that restores trust in our own mind; we stop treating ourselves as unreliable note‑takers or idea chasers.

• Risk: the lot becomes a procrastination tool—capturing replaces doing. Limit capture to 45 seconds; keep the promotion cap; measure promotions.
• Risk: we use the lot to avoid deciding. The weekly review is where we decide. If we find ourselves deferring the same idea twice, we must either break it into a smaller test or delete it.
• Limit: this habit does not guarantee idea quality. It guarantees idea survivability and scheduled evaluation. We still need judgment.
• Limit: some ideas expire with the market or team plan; the lot will not rescue those without timely review.

Busy day alternative (≤5 minutes)

• Step 1 (2 minutes): Open Quick Capture and add three bare titles only, one per idea. No gist, no fields.
• Step 2 (3 minutes, at day end): Add one‑line gists and expiry to those three. Done. Everything else waits for Friday review.

After four weeks, the lot becomes normal. We capture 1–4 ideas most days (mean 2). We spend 2–5 minutes capturing. We spend 20 minutes on Friday reviewing. We promote 1–2 ideas weekly. Our idea‑to‑action cycle has fewer “ghosts”—ideas we half‑remember and regret losing. We gain back mental quiet during focused work. We see, specifically, what we are not doing and accept it consciously.

We also notice the quality of ideas change. The presence of a weekly review nudges us to think in testable next steps. We stop narrating grand plans and start sketching small experiments. That shift alone compounds.

We close with a set of micro‑decisions for today:

• We commit to a single home for ideas (Brali LifeOS Smart Idea Parking Lot).
• We commit to a 45‑second capture cap with six fields.
• We commit to a Friday 16:00 weekly review, 20 minutes, for three weeks.
• We commit to promoting at most two ideas per week.
• We commit to deleting without guilt.

And we give ourselves one kindness: we let ideas arrive any time they want. We will not chase them. We will not scold them. We will offer them a small chair and a name tag. We will take care of them later, on purpose.

Check‑in Block

• Daily (3 Qs):
  1. Did I capture at least one idea the moment it appeared? (Y/N)
  2. How long did today’s captures take in total? (minutes)
  3. Did any capture exceed 60 seconds? If yes, which and why?
• Weekly (3 Qs):
  1. Did I complete my 20‑minute Idea Lot review this week? (Y/N)
  2. How many ideas did I promote, delete, and defer? (counts)
  3. Did promoted ideas have a scheduled 10‑minute first step? (Y/N)
• Metrics to log:
  • Ideas captured (count/day)
  • Capture time (minutes/day)

Sample Day Tally (reach today’s target: ≥2 captures, ≤5 minutes capture time)

• 09:10 “Daily triage SLA” — 45s
• 12:40 “Two‑question onboarding” — 35s
• 15:55 “3‑slide exec update” — 50s Totals: 3 captures, 130 seconds (2.2 minutes). Targets met.

We finish the day. Three ideas sit in the lot, each with a small heartbeat: a title, a sentence, a first step, an expiry. They are not pressure; they are potential. We close the laptop and feel the quietness that comes when our mind is not asked to be a filing cabinet. Tomorrow, and Friday at 16:00, we will be fair to them. Some will live. Some will go. All will be handled.

—